Prescribing a group of automorphisms |
The intention is to reduce the incidence matrix to a much smaller matrix so that we can solve the corresponding diophantine system of equations by running a modern implementation of the LLL-algorithm on a workstation or a personal computer. To achieve this goal we use the concept of finite group actions and the prescription of a group of automorphisms (similar to the methods we use in the above mentioned research project on the construction of classical -designs). Of course, this prescription is risky since there may be no designs with that particular group of automorphisms, but if there are such designs then it will pay since the number of rows of the incidence matrix, which is the number of
-subspaces in
, will reduce to the number of orbits of that group, and the same holds for the number of columns. This will bring the construction problem within reach of computers!
An automorphism of a -design
is an element
of the general linear group
which leaves the design invariant, i. e. it maps blocks onto blocks, it permutes the design:
A group consisting only of automorphisms of is an automorphism group of
, the maximal group with this property is called the (full) automorphism group of
The crucial facts are now as simple as this:
2.1 Remarks If is an automorphism group of the
-design
then
consists of full orbits of
We may therefore restrict our attention to the orbits of
- The inclusion
of
-spaces
in
-spaces
is invariant under the action of
- Therefore, for
and
the number of
in the orbit of
which lie above
is constant on the orbit of
- This number is a sum of values of the
-function on the lattice of subspaces of
and we shall denote it as follows:
This embeds this problem into the theory of group actions on posets (cf. [8]) and it motivates the introduction of the matrix , a
-analog of the Kramer-Mesner matrix ([10]) for standard combinatorial designs on sets. Its rows (resp. columns) are indicated by the elements
(resp.
) of a transversal of the set
of orbits of
on
(resp. of a transversal of the set
of orbits of
on
), and the entries are the above mentioned values
The following theorem is now immediate from the above remarks:
2.2 Theorem The set of -designs
having
as an automorphism group can be obtained from the 0-1-vectors solving the linear system of equations
in the following way:
This method of generalizing the Kramer-Mesner approach to -analogs of designs was already used in [7], but the derivation of 2-designs which admit
which is given there, uses ad hoc methods which cannot be used in the general case. We are therefore going to describe now a general approach that can be used, in principle, in any case. The first step in this direction is the evaluation of transversals of the sets of orbits
For this purpose we can use the Fundamental Lemma of the theory of finite group actions (see e. g. [8],[11]) which reads as follows:
2.3 The Fundamental Lemma If
denotes a finite group action, and a subgroup of
then, for each
the set of orbits of
on
can be mapped bijectively onto the set of
-double cosets:
where means the stabilizer of
in
In order to apply it we use the fact that the general linear group is transitive both on
and on
and so the following is true:
2.4 Corollary We can obtain the desired transversals of the orbit sets of from transversals of sets of double cosets by reverting the following bijections
and
where and
are (arbitrary but fixed) elements of
respectively, while
and
denote their stabilizers in the full linear group.
For and
, respectively, we can take the subspaces generatedby the
, respectively
first unit vectors,
and
The corresponding stabilizers
and
consist of the nonsingular matrices with a box of zeros of size
and
in the lower left hand corner.
All what remains is the determination of transversals of the sets of double cosets and
. For this purpose we use a generalization of the ladder game introduced by B. Schmalz in [14],[15],[16] in order to construct designs on sets.